Gayle et al v. Pioske
| Edward Gayle and Lisa Gayle |
| Suzette Pioske |
| 4:2023cv00262 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/13/2023. Discovery due by 12/20/2023. Motions due by 5/1/2024. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 2/16/2024. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 3/8/2024. Status Report due by 4/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/24/23. (loh)
|
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nichols, Titus) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (csr) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Restriction of Discovery Related Materials re: 11 - 12 Certificates of Service. (csr) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER terminating #9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. The Court directs the parties to file a revised Rule 26(f) Report no later than October 26, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/19/2023. (maa)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (csr) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (McKinnon, Janine) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Suzette Pioske re #1 Notice of Removal,, Civil Cover Sheet (McKinnon, Janine) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting re #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Christine A. Forsythe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/22/23. (loh)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3667992, Fee Amount $200, by Edward Gayle, Lisa Gayle. Responses due by 10/6/2023. (Nichols, Titus) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Titus Thomas Nichols on behalf of Edward Gayle, Lisa Gayle (Nichols, Titus) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3667992, Fee Amount $200, (pts) |
| Filing 4 REMOVAL NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re #1 Notice of Removal, Plaintiff's Notice of Appearance due by 9/24/2023. Previously filed motions in State Court due by 9/28/2023. (gmh) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/14/2023. (gmh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal, Attachment #4, Civil Cover Sheet. After 14 days of noncompliance, a notice will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. (gmh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Edward Gayle, Lisa Gayle from State Court of Dekalb County, case number 23A03586. Answer filed on 9/13/2023. (Filing fee paid: $402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3662007) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents: Case Filing Information Form, Summons, Complaint, Plaintiff's 5.2 Certificate, Plaintiff's First Interrogatories, Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents, Plaintiff's First Request for Admissions, Plaintiff's 5.2 Certificate, Sheriff's Entry of Service, Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses; #2 Exhibit B - State Court Notice of Removal; #3 Exhibit C - Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Defendant; #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (gmh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Notices of Appearance due 9/24/2023. Compliance re #2 Notice due by 9/28/2023. Motions due by 9/28/2023. (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
