Joseph v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
| Russell Joseph |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
| 4:2023cv00265 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| J Randal Hall |
| Christopher L Ray |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/14/2023. Discovery due by 2/2/2024. Motions due by 3/4/2024. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 12/4/2023. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 1/2/2024. Status Report due by 2/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/17/23. (loh)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (jrb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann H. Searcy on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Searcy, Ann) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Searcy, Ann) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William Jarrell Degenhart on behalf of Russell Joseph (Degenhart, William) |
| Filing 7 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh) |
|
Filing 6
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 09/15/2023. (jlh)
|
| Filing 5 Removal NOTICE to All Counsel of Record. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 9/25/2023.) (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/18/2023: #1 Corrected Main Document) (jlh). |
| Filing 4 Statement of Motions Pending. (jlh) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (jlh) |
| Filing 2 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (jlh) Modified on 9/15/2023 (jlh). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court of Chatham County, State of Georgia, case number STCV23-00254, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3662858.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Case Filing Information Form, Summons, Complaint, Sheriff's Entry of Service, Answer, Certificate (5.2), Stipulation of Confidentiality, Certificate (5.2), Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Answer to Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Deposition of Plaintiff Russell Joseph, #3 Exhibit C - Defendant's First Interrogatories, and #4 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joseph v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Russell Joseph | |
| Represented By: | William Jarrell Degenhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Garret W. Meader |
| Represented By: | Ann H. Searcy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
