Green v. Chatham County Jail
| Rashid Roekwan Green |
| Chatham County Jail |
| 4:2023cv00335 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
JUDGMENT entered dismissing Plaintiff's complaint for failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute his case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/22/24. (loh)
|
| Filing 12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Rashid Roekwan Green. (pts) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT by Prisoner Rashid Roekwan Green to collection of fees. (pts) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #1 Complaint is DISMISSED for failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute his case. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/22/24. (loh)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. PLRA due by 12/26/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/12/23. (wwp)
|
| Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray. District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to the case. (wwp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing signature page by Rashid Roekwan Green re #1 Complaint. (wwp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re: #4 Order re Magistrate Assignment. After 14 days of noncompliance a notice will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Compliance due by 12/25/2023. (csr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 12/11/2023. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 11/27/2023. (Attachment: #1 Party's Statement Form.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. If action is required, after 14 days of noncompliance a notice will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 12/11/2023.) (jlh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Rashid Roekwan Green. Responses due by 12/11/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chatham County Jail, filed by Rashid Roekwan Green. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Green v. Chatham County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rashid Roekwan Green | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chatham County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
