Rudzinskas v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maryann Rudzinskas
Defendant: Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2024cv00009
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: R Stan Baker
Referring Judge: Christopher L Ray
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 3/18/2024. Discovery due by 5/1/2024. Motions due by 8/19/2024. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 6/17/2024. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 6/24/2024. Status Report due by 7/31/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 2/28/24. (loh)
February 27, 2024 Filing 19 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Maryann Rudzinskas. Amendment to Motions Referred Amended Rule 26(f) Report. (Savage, Brent)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER re #16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. The parties are DIRECTED to file a revised Rule 26(f) Report no later than February 28, 2024. The parties initial Rule 26(f) Report is TERMINATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 2/21/24. (loh)
February 21, 2024 Set/Reset Deadline: Revised Rule 26 Report due by 2/28/2024. (loh)
February 20, 2024 Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (thb)
February 20, 2024 Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Savage, Brent)
February 20, 2024 MOTIONS REFERRED: #16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (thb)
February 5, 2024 Filing 15 Notice of Standing Order regarding cases pending before District Judge R. Stan Baker. This Order is effective as of February 1, 2024. # Click Here to View. (pmh)
January 22, 2024 Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1) by Maryann Rudzinskas. (Savage, Brent)
January 16, 2024 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1) by Retractable Technologies, Inc.. (Helm, Elizabeth)
January 16, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re: 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1). After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Compliance due by 1/30/2024. (csr)
January 16, 2024 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Retractable Technologies, Inc..(Helm, Elizabeth)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for Attorney Alex G. Pisciarino. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/09/2024. (jlh)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for Attorney Elizabeth C. Helm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/09/2024. (jlh)
January 9, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Savage, Sr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Savage, Brent)
January 8, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Alex G. Pisciarino Receipt Number AGASDC-3737034, Fee Amount $200, by Retractable Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 1/22/2024. (Ghosh, Sanjay)
January 8, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Elizabeth C. Helm Receipt Number AGASDC-3737028, Fee Amount $200, by Retractable Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 1/22/2024. (Ghosh, Sanjay)
January 8, 2024 Filing 4 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 01/08/2024. (jlh)
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 Removal NOTICE to All Counsel of Record. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Retractable Technologies, Inc. answer due 1/15/2024; Compliance due by 1/18/2024.) (jlh)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, case number STCV23-02341, filed by Retractable Technologies, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405.00, receipt number AGASDC-3736702.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, Complaint, Plaintiff's First Interrogatories, Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Sheriff's Return of Service, and #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh)
January 8, 2024 MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Elizabeth C. Helm Receipt Number AGASDC-3737028, Fee Amount $200, #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Alex G. Pisciarino, Receipt Number AGASDC-3737034, Fee Amount $200. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rudzinskas v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maryann Rudzinskas
Represented By: Brent Savage, Sr
Represented By: Matthew Richard Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Sanjay Ghosh
Represented By: Alex G. Pisciarino
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Helm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?