Levy v. Hagood et al
Plaintiff: Charles Christian Levy
Defendant: A. Hagood and Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State)
Case Number: 4:2024cv00096
Filed: May 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Christopher L Ray
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #7 Motion for court order to gain access to extended use of law library. ORDER directing Plaintiff to show cause why his #1 Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's #4 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 7/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent form) (gmh)
July 10, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines: Show Cause Response and Consent Form due by 7/26/2024. (gmh)
July 5, 2024 Filing 10 Summons and Subpoena Submitted. (jrb)
June 20, 2024 Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Charles Christian Levy. (loh)
June 11, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for court order to gain access to extended use of law library by Charles Christian Levy. (wwp)
June 11, 2024 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray. Chief District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to the case. (wwp)
June 6, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #3 Order re Magistrate Assignment. Compliance due by 6/20/2024. (kjm)
May 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 6/6/2024.Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/23/24. (wwp)
May 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to A. Hagood, Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State). Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 6/6/2024. Signed by Chief Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/23/24. (Attachments: #1 Statement) (wwp)
May 23, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Christian Levy. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp)
May 23, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State), A. Hagood, filed by Charles Christian Levy.(wwp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levy v. Hagood et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Hagood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Christian Levy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?