Levy v. Hagood et al
| Charles Christian Levy |
| A. Hagood and Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State) |
| 4:2024cv00096 |
| May 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 6/6/2024.Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/23/24. (wwp)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to A. Hagood, Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State). Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 6/6/2024. Signed by Chief Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/23/24. (Attachments: #1 Statement) (wwp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Christian Levy. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State), A. Hagood, filed by Charles Christian Levy.(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
