Waters v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Geana M. Waters
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Case Number: 5:2009cv00030
Filed: June 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Waycross Office
County: Ware
Presiding Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations; Plft's objections are w/out merit and are overruled. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment.. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/21/2010. (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waters v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geana M. Waters
Represented By: Kathy D. Hackel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?