Sidney v. Flash Foods Inc.
Eddy Sidney |
Flash Foods Inc. |
5:2013cv00074 |
August 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Waycross Office |
Ware |
James E. Graham |
Lisa G. Wood |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting Defendant's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment, and its request for attorney's fees is denied for reasons stated herein. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/10/2014. (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sidney v. Flash Foods Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Flash Foods Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eddy Sidney | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.