Ponsell v. Royal et al
Jody L. Ponsell |
Randy F. Royal, Rebecca Williams and Ware County, Georgia |
5:2014cv00042 |
May 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Waycross Office |
Ware |
James E. Graham |
Lisa G. Wood |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER granting Defendant's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's claims for First Amendment violation. Plaintiff's claims for Georgia Whistleblower Act violations against Defendant Royal in his official capacity and inten tional infliction of emotional distress against Defendant Royal in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject to any right to pursue these claims in the appropriate state forum. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/3/2015. (ca) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting in part as to all claims addressed above except for the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendant Royal in his individual capacity and denying in part Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss. The only cla ims that will proceed are the First Amendment retaliation claim, the Georgia whistleblower claims, and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Defendant Royal in his individual capacity. Defendants Williams and Ware County are hereby dismissed from this action. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/17/2015. (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.