Griggs v. Gramick et al
Antonio Griggs |
Tom Gramick, Edwina Johnson and Boyett |
5:2016cv00017 |
February 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Waycross Office |
Ware |
R. Stan Baker |
Lisa G. Wood |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint, without prejudice, based on his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/25/2016. (csr) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DENY Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re: 1 Complaint filed by Antonio Griggs. Any party seeking to object to thi s Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 3/10/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 2/25/2016. (csr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.