Gordon v. Johns et al
| Dennis E. Gordon |
| Tracy Johns, George Zoley, Donna Mellendick, Harrell Watts and Charles E. Samuels, Jr. |
| 5:2016cv00028 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 8 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint, filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/2/2016. (ca)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file spec ific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 6/7/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/24/2016. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
