Jerez-Toco v. Samuels et al
| Nery Rolando Jerez-Toco |
| Charles Samuels, Tracy Johns and George Zoley |
| 5:2016cv00091 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Charlton |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Court DISMISSES Jerez-Toco's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/14/2016. (ca)
|
|
Filing
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Jerez-Toco's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice and CLOSE this case. It is also RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Jerez-Toco in forma pauperis statu s on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/21/2016. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
