Ramirez v. The United States of America et al
||Daniel Contreras Ramirez
||United States, United States District Attorney, United States District Court, The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and The Department of Immigration Services (ICE)
||December 15, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
||XX US, Outside State
||R. Stan Baker
||Lisa G. Wood
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 9, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING 21 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's 17 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/9/2017. (ca)
|September 19, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Ramirez's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, GRANT Respondent's 17 MOTION to Dismiss, and CLOSE this case. It is fur ther RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Ramirez leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/19/2017. (ca)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?