Berry v. Bryson

Berry v. Bryson

Plaintiff:	Delwin Berry
Defendant:	Bryson
Case Number:	5:2017cv00013
Filed:	January 23, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Waycross Office
County:	Ware
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2017	Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 4 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DISMISSES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Amend, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/20/2017. (csr)
March 9, 2017	Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS as moot Plaintiff's 3 MOTION to Amend/Correct, DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint without prejudice, DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case, and DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/9/2017. Modified on 3/9/2017 (ca).

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2017

Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 4 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DISMISSES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Amend, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/20/2017. (csr)

March 9, 2017

Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS as moot Plaintiff's 3 MOTION to Amend/Correct, DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint without prejudice, DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case, and DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/9/2017. Modified on 3/9/2017 (ca).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. Bryson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delwin Berry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bryson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?