Woldemichael v. Simon

Woldemichael v. Simon

Petitioner:	Tesfai Woldu Woldemichael
Respondent:	Heath Simon
Case Number:	5:2017cv00044
Filed:	May 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Waycross Office
County:	Charlton
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 24, 2017	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 and dismissing as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss, 10 Motion to Dismiss and 8 Motion. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/17. (slt)
September 27, 2017	Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action, without prejudice, and DIRECT the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by T esfai Woldu Woldemichael. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Woldemichael leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections with in fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/27/2017. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 24, 2017

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 and dismissing as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss, 10 Motion to Dismiss and 8 Motion. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/17. (slt)

September 27, 2017

Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action, without prejudice, and DIRECT the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by T esfai Woldu Woldemichael. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Woldemichael leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections with in fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/27/2017. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woldemichael v. Simon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tesfai Woldu Woldemichael
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Heath Simon
Represented By:	Jason W. Blanchard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?