Mohammed v. Unknown
| Sani Mohammed |
| Jeff Sessions, John Kelly, Sean W. Gallagher and C. Smith |
| 5:2017cv00049 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 14 Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Mohammed's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DENIES Mohammed in forma status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/23/2017. (csr)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Mohammed's 1 Petition, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Mohammed leave to proceed in forma pauper is on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/28/2017. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
