Chen v. Gartland
Petitioner: Zhan Chen
Respondent: Patrick Gartland
Case Number: 5:2017cv00079
Filed: June 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Waycross Office
County: Charlton
Presiding Judge: R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES as moot Chen's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DENIES Chen in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/23/2017. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Zhan Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Patrick Gartland
Represented By: Bradford Collins Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?