Alex v. Gartland

Alex v. Gartland

Petitioner:	Elonga Bolimo Alex
Respondent:	Patrick Gartland
Case Number:	5:2017cv00089
Filed:	July 17, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Waycross Office
County:	Charlton
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 9, 2017	Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Alex's 1 28 U.S.C. § Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DENIES Alex in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/8/2017. (csr) Modified on 11/9/2017 (csr).
October 20, 2017	Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Alex's 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY ALEX in forma pauperis statu s on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/20/2017. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 9, 2017

Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 11 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Alex's 1 28 U.S.C. § Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DENIES Alex in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/8/2017. (csr) Modified on 11/9/2017 (csr).

October 20, 2017

Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Alex's 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY ALEX in forma pauperis statu s on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/3/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/20/2017. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alex v. Gartland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Elonga Bolimo Alex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Patrick Gartland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?