Davenport v. Hall et al
| Gregory Allen Davenport |
| Hilton Hall, Dewayne H. Gillis and Christopher M. Carr |
| 5:2017cv00092 |
| July 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Coffee |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to 6 Order dated 8/28/17. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/31/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Davenport's Objection. The Court DISMISSES Davenport's Complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/28/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action for failure to state a claim and DENY Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re 1 Complaint filed by Gregory Allen Davenport. The Court ORDERS an y party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/8/2017. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
