Mbengue v. Gartland et al
| Khadim Mbengue |
| Patrick Gartland, Jeff Sessions, Conrad Agagan, John Kelly and Sean W. Gallagher |
| 5:2017cv00099 |
| August 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Charlton |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 6 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Mbengue's 1 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DENIES Mbengue in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/9/2017. (csr)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Mbengue's 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENY Mbengue in forma pauperi s status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/19/2017. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
