Thomas v. Spivey et al
Plaintiff: Donta Lee Thomas
Defendant: Andrew Spivey and Chris Rosar
Case Number: 5:2018cv00008
Filed: February 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Waycross Office
County: Coffee
Presiding Judge: R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 12 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/20/2019. (csr)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion in Limine, and 5 Motion for a Pretrial Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/22/2019. (csr)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 9 Report and Recommendation. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Spivey. The Court ORDERS the Clerk to update the parties to this action to reflect the dismissal of Defendant S pivey. Additionally, the Court cautions Plaintiff that he must provide a correct mailing address to the Court. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/28/2019. (csr) Modified on 5/30/2019 (csr).
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Spivey re: 1 Complaint. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to mail Plaintiff copies of Forms AO 398 and 399 and a copy of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court Orders Plaintiff to file proof of service with this Court as to Defendant Rosar within 60 days of this Order. The Court also ORDERS Plaintiff to continue to double-space all of his future filings with this Court. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 4/30/2019. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Spivey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donta Lee Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Spivey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Rosar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?