Tolbert v. Johnson et al
| Daniel H. Tolbert |
| A. Johnson, Mendemhall, K. Bell, Markham, V. Howell, L. Reed, M. Arabeck, R. Dan, Augustin and Ricky Stone |
| 5:2018cv00036 |
| April 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Coffee |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to 48 Order filed 4/15/2020. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/17/2020. (ca)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 47 ; denying as moot 41 Motion for Summary Judgment and 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and denies Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 04/13/2020. (MG)
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Court dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, deny as moot Defendants' 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment, direct the Clerk of Court to close this case an d enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and deny Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. (Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2020). ORDER directing service of this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 03/18/2020. (MG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
