Grady v. City of Waycross et al
Plaintiff: Peggy Grady
Defendant: City of Waycross and Raphel Maddox
Case Number: 5:2018cv00083
Filed: October 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2018 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Raphel Maddox.(Blackerby, Steven)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Clerk's Extension of Time (LR 6.1). Defendant Maddox Answer due 12/3/2018. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/26/2018. (csr)
November 26, 2018 Filing 10 Consent Motion for Clerks Extension of Time (LR 6.1) to File Answer by Raphel Maddox. Responses due by 12/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Blackerby, Steven)
November 19, 2018 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Waycross.(Bean, Brenton)
November 8, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peggy Grady. Raphel Maddox served on 11/3/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Durham, James)
November 8, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peggy Grady. City of Waycross served on 10/29/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. (Durham, James)
November 7, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel LeCraw Mikell on behalf of Peggy Grady. (Mikell, Samuel) Modified on 11/7/2018 (ca).
November 7, 2018 Filing 5 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Peggy Grady. (Durham, James)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Peggy Grady. (Durham, James)
October 25, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Waycross. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Raphel Maddox). (csr)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 10/25/2018. (csr)
October 25, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Peggy Grady. $400.00 Filing Fee Paid - Receipt Number: 113J-2471353. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Attachment). (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2018: #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Dismissal and Notice of Rights - EEOC) (ca).
October 25, 2018 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 113J-2471353. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grady v. City of Waycross et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Waycross
Represented By: Brenton S. Bean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raphel Maddox
Represented By: Steven G. Blackerby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Grady
Represented By: James D. Durham
Represented By: Adrianne Alexandra Brown
Represented By: Samuel LeCraw Mikell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?