Crews v. Frost-Arnett Company
| Brandi Crews |
| Frost-Arnett Company |
| 5:2019cv00043 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 8/2/2019. Discovery due by 10/23/2019. Motions due by 1/17/2020. Pretrial Order due by 1/27/2020. Status Report due by 12/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/16/2019. (ca)
|
| NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Status Conference set for 12/20/2019 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. Dial-in instructions will be provided by Courtroom Deputy Clerk prior to scheduled call. (km) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Restriction/Return of Discovery Related Materials re #9 Notice of Intent. (ca) |
| Filing 9 **Entered in error**NOTICE of Intent to Serve Documents Subpoena Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 by Frost-Arnett Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Copy of Redacted Intended Subpoena to Be Served)(Chapman, Michael) Modified on 7/12/2019 (ca). |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Chapman, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #2 Removal Notice. Attorney appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff has not been filed. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 7/1/2019. (ca) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Frost-Arnett Company.(Chapman, Michael) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance: Attorney Appearance - Plaintiff due by 6/8/2019. Pending State Motions due by 6/12/2019. (ca) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Frost-Arnett Company. (Chapman, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bedard, Jr on behalf of Frost-Arnett Company (Bedard, John) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 5/29/2019. (ca)
|
| Filing 2 REMOVAL NOTICE to all Counsel of Record re #1 Notice of Removal.(ca) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Pierce County, State of Georgia, case number SUCA2019000093. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113J-2611011), filed by Frost-Arnett Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Service of Process, Summons, Complaint, General Civil Case Filing Information, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Frost-Arnett Company answer due 6/4/2019. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crews v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandi Crews | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bedard, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Chapman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
