Jones v. Johns
Lloyd Harold Jones |
Tracy Johns |
5:2019cv00061 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Letter from Lloyd Harold Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ca) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #8 Response. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 9/24/2019. (ca) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tracy Johns filed by Lloyd Harold Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(ca) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tracy Johns. The Court ORDERS Petitioner to file any objections to the Respondent's motion for dismissal or to otherwise inform the Court of his decision not to object within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/30/2019. (ca) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses / Objections due by 9/13/2019. (ca) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Tracy Johns. Responses due by 9/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Roger Perry w/attachs)(Leithart, Otto) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Dismiss. (ca) |
Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Attorney General of the U.S. for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lloyd Harold Jones, #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, on 8/19/2019. (ca) |
Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Tracy Johns for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lloyd Harold Jones, #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, on 8/14/2019. (ca) |
Filing 3 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to U.S. Attorney for the SDGA for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lloyd Harold Jones, #2 Order Directing USMS Service of Process, on 8/14/2019. (ca) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Show Cause Response due by 9/4/2019. (ca) |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process by registered or certified mail a copy of the #1 Petition and a copy of this Order upon: (1) the Attorney General of the U.S.; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the U.S. Attorney for the SDGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/17/2019. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2019: #1 Prepared 285 Forms) (ca). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Lloyd Harold Jones. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(ca) |
Filing fee payment received, Amount $5.00, Receipt BWK008658. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Johns | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tracy Johns | |
Represented By: | Otto Woelke Leithart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Lloyd Harold Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.