Llewlyn v. Johns
Petitioner: Charles Llewlyn
Respondent: Tracy Johns
Case Number: 5:2020cv00077
Filed: June 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Benjamin W Cheesbro
Referring Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2020 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charles Llewlyn. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1). (csr)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting construed #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #3 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 07/30/2020. (MG)
July 28, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time, titled "Motion Directing Respondent to Provide Access to the Court to Comply with Court Order" filed by Charles Llewlyn. Responses due by 8/11/2020. REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. (csr) Modified on 7/30/2020 (MG).
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tracy Johns. The Court ORDERS Petitioner to file any objections to the Respondent's motion for dismissal or to otherwise inform the Court of his decision not to object to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 7/17/2020. (ca)
July 17, 2020 Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses/Objections due by 7/31/2020. (ca)
July 14, 2020 Filing 5 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Tracy Johns, Attorney General of the U.S., and U.S. Attorney for the SDGA (Civil Process Clerk). (ca)
July 14, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Tracy Johns. Responses due by 7/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.Declaration.Childs w attachs)(Patrick, Bradford)
July 14, 2020 MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 MOTION to Dismiss. (csr)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process. The Court directs the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the Petition #1 and a copy of this Order by registered or certified mail upon: (1) the Attorney General of the United States; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 6/17/2020. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2020: #1 Prepared 285 forms) (ca).
June 15, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Llewlyn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope) (MG)
June 15, 2020 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number BWK009626. (MG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Llewlyn v. Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Llewlyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tracy Johns
Represented By: Bradford Collins Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?