Spaar v. Saul
| Chad Spaar |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 5:2020cv00094 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Andrew Saul (Statkus, Shannon) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process re #1 Complaint and #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, upon the Defendant, the Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia without prepayment of cost. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 07/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 Forms) (MG)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 07/24/2020. (MG)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Submitted. (MG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chad Spaar. Responses due by 8/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. (MG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Chad Spaar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
