Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Amin
| Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. |
| Mahendra Amin |
| 5:2021cv00054 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Terri A. Sutton. Alycen Moss has entered an appearance in this case and vouches she will satisfy the obligations of local counsel, as this Court's Local Rule 83.4 requires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on August 31, 2021. (edd)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. re #7 Notice of Filing,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Terri A. Sutton Receipt Number AGASDC-3173731, Fee Amount $200, (Moss, Alycen) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Terri A. Sutton, Receipt Number AGASDC-3173731, Fee Amount $200. (thb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Terri A. Sutton. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 9/9/2021. (thb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Terri A. Sutton Receipt Number AGASDC-3173731, Fee Amount $200, by Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc.. Responses due by 9/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moss, Alycen) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2021: #2 Certificate of Good Standing and Statement) (thb). |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc.. Mahendra Amin waiver sent on 8/24/2021, answer due 10/23/2021. (Moss, Alycen) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mahendra Amin. (csr) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 8/18/2021. (csr)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. (csr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mahendra Amin, filed by Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. $402.00 Filing Fee Paid - Receipt Number: AGASDC-3167038. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Amin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Medchoice Risk Retention Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alycen A. Moss |
| Represented By: | Terri A. Sutton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mahendra Amin | |
| Represented By: | Scott Robert Grubman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
