CNH Capital America LLC v. Southeastern Aggregate, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: CNH Capital America LLC
Defendant: Southeastern Aggregate, Inc. and Cleone B. Brown
Case Number: 6:2008cv00027
Filed: April 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Candler
Presiding Judge: B. Avant Edenfield
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER denying as moot 75 Motion ; granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 84 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 95 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 96 Motion in Limine; granting 98 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 10/1/09. (wwp)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER denying 83 Motion for Default Judgment without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6:8cv27. (mah)
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion to Dismiss; granting 72 Motion for Entry of Default against Southeastern Aggregate, Inc.. SAI's third-party complaint against ACE 32 , as well as its counterclaim against CNH, 10 30 are dismissed without prejudice. The Court denies both parties' motions to strike SAI's answer to CNH's complaint. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 8/4/2009. (mah)
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative to Strike. The Court Denies ACE's motion to dismiss or strike SAI's conspiracy claim against it, and instead joins ACE in this action as a co-defendant to SAI's conspiracy counterclaim. The Court Grants ACE's motion to dismiss SAI's remaining claims against ACE, which are Dismissed Without Prejudice. CNH's complaint against ACE should be recharacterized as a crossclaim against co-counter-defendant ACE. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/18/2009. (mah)
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDERED that Southern Aggregate obtain representation within 10 days from the date this Order is served. The Scheduling Order is hereby amended, shifting all dates back by 30 days to accommodate this interim ruling and associated time span. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/26/2009. (mah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CNH Capital America LLC v. Southeastern Aggregate, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CNH Capital America LLC
Represented By: David A. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southeastern Aggregate, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleone B. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?