Ojeda-Sanchez et al v. Bland Farms, LLC et al
| Florencio Cortes-Gonzalez, David Ojeda-Sanchez, Alfonso Guerrero-Hernandez, Arturo Morales-Morales, Raul Morales-Morales, Oscar Antonio Morales-Ramirez, Juan Pablo Ortiz-Rocha and and others similarly situated |
| Bland Farms, LLC, Michael Hively and Delbert Bland |
| 6:2008cv00096 |
| October 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
390
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 371 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 10/16/2013. (loh)
|
|
Filing
368
ORDER that the Court enters judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs in the amount of $18,923.53, including $2,543.16 in damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and accordingly the prior judgment entered as Docket 339 is hereby amended. Defendant is liable to each individual Plaintiff in the amounts listed in Doc. 362-1. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/3/13. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
350
ORDERED that Bland has 7 days from the date of this Order to file specific itemized objections to plaintiffs' Bill of Costs. Plaintiffs are Ordered to submit their response within 7 days of Bland's filing. re 340 Bill of Costs, filed by David Ojeda-Sanchez. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 9/27/11. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
339
JUDGMENT entered in favor of the Plaintiffs in the amount of thirteen thousand eighty dollars and eighteen cents ($13,080.18). Defendant is liable to each individual Plaintiff in the amount listed. (loh)
|
|
Filing
331
ORDER stating that this Court enters judgment in the favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of thirteen thousand eighty dollars and eighteen cents. Defendant is liable to each individual plaintiff in the amounts listed in Doc. 330-2. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/16/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
328
ORDER directing Plaintiffs to submit new damages charts within 5 days of this Order. Bland is ordered to respond within 5 days of Plaintiffs' filing (Amended Damages Chart due by 6/6/2011). Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 06/01/2011. (lmm)
|
|
Filing
325
ORDER directing the Plaintiffs to file amended damages calculations within 10 days of this Order. Bland is ordered to submit a response within 10 days of Plaintiffs' filing. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 04/25/2011. (lmm) Modified on 4/25/2011 (lmm).
|
|
Filing
316
ORDER granting 299 Motion for Leave of Absence; denying 302 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 306 Motion ; denying 309 Motion. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 2/22/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
304
ORDER stating that briefs on each issue are due to the Court on or before Friday, February 4, 2011. Due to a slight adjustment in the Court's schedule, the parties are to report to Court on Tuesday, February 8 at 9 a.m. for trial. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/31/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
298
ORDER that case to proceed without a jury, any motions to empanel a jury must be filed along w/the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are due 14 days prior to trial date. Parties are also directed to file 1:summary of the eviden ce it will present at trial; 2: form it expects such evidence will take, along w/the manner of presentation, 3: length of time for the presentation; 4: any other guidance or information it believes will assist the Court in sifting through the voluminous evidence Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/13/2011. (loh) Modified on 1/13/2011 (jsr).
|
|
Filing
297
ORDER denying 294 Motion to Exclude Testimony. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/12/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
264
ORDER granting 143 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 144 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 145 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Blan d Farms is directed to have their appraisal expert available for deposition and the parties are directed to meet and file a joint pretrial order no later than 09/17/2010. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 08/18/2010. (lmm) Modified on 8/18/2010 (lmm).
|
|
Filing
261
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 182 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 06/14/2010. (lmm)
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER denying 222 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/11/2010. (loh)
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 141 Motion in Limine; denying 155 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/10/2010. (loh)
|
|
Filing
245
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 181 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/4/2010. (loh)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 11/16/2009. (loh)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Compel; granting 54 defendants' motion for a protective order as to its Legal Services Corporation complaint; denying 56 Motion for Hearing; denying as moot 57 second Motion to Comp el; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to designate their experts, after which defendants shall have 14 days to designate theirs. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/31/2009. (mah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
