Williamson v. Office of the United States Trustee
Appellant: Jack M. Williamson
Appellee: Office of the United States Trustee
Case Number: 6:2008cv00097
Filed: November 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Emanuel
Presiding Judge: B. Avant Edenfield
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the Court Affirms the Bankruptcy Court's decision. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/4/09. (bcw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williamson v. Office of the United States Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Jack M. Williamson
Represented By: Jon Alexander Levis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Office of the United States Trustee
Represented By: Matthew E. Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?