Bloedorn v. Dr. Bruce Grube, et al
Benjamin Bloedorn |
Bruce Grube, Teresa Thompson, Susan Nelson, Kenneth Brown and George Hemm |
6:2009cv00055 |
July 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Statesboro Office |
XX US, Outside State |
B. Avant Edenfield |
G. R. Smith |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER granting 71 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/2/2012. (loh) |
Filing 94 ORDER affirming in part, reversing in part re 88 Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Order on Motion to Compel. The parties are ordered to supplement their briefing regarding defendants' motion to dismiss within thirty days of this Order. All other discovery is stayed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/6/2012. (loh) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting 72 Motion to Stay Discovery; granting 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 71 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 75 Motion to Compel. Responses due by 2/10/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 01/20/2012. (lmm) |
Filing 64 ORDER stating that the remaining allegations against Hemm are dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 8/16/2011. (loh) |
Filing 33 ORDER denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 11/23/2009. (lmm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.