Brown v. Jackson et al
| Johnathan Heart Brown |
| R. L. Jackson and Shuemake |
| 6:2012cv00099 |
| October 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
ORDER denying 150 Motion to Alter Judgment and 153 Motion; denying as moot 154 Motion. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 2/8/16. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
149
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Joseph Hutcheson, Reginald Ford, Ronnie Shumake and against Johnathan Heart Brown in accordance with the Order of this Court entered on August 26, 2015. Signed on 8/26/15. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying 65 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 9/16/2013. (loh)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING re 20 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Bruce Chatham and R. L. Jackson are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/6/2013. (loh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint, Documents Numbered 3 and 18, and a copy of this Order shall be served upon Defendants Shuemake, Hutchenson, and Ford by the United States Marshal. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 1/25/2013. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
