Jackson et al v. Catanzariti et al
| Miguel Jackson and Kelvin Stevenson |
| Joseph Catanzariti, Andrew McFarlane, Joshua Eason, Timonthy Simmons, Candice Hill, Retania Harvey, Christopher Henderson, Nathaniel Milton, Sandi West, Melvin Wells, Sherry Ritchie, Brandon Cearnel, Carolyn Carrol, Joseph Powell, Derius Attical, Sheldon Deloach, Darryl Davis, Benjamin Ashley, Joyce Carver, Sharon Frasier, Tammy Watkins, Linda Bass, Elizabeth Haire, Jeffery Mullis, Jarrod Bennett, Joseph White, Gordon Pittman, Gene Tootle, Justin Swope, Gary Mitchell, John Jones, Michael Deloach, Mary Roach, Jaleesa Miller, Caleb Harrison, Rodercik Clayton, Brandi Joseph, Kim Hardee and Crystal Dotson |
| 6:2012cv00113 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
554
ORDER granting Defendant's revised Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 553 ), and sanctions are awarded in the amount of $16,840.20 against Plaintiffs' counsel. Signed by District Judge J. Randal Hall on 4/17/2026. (amd)
|
Filing
548
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 493 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 503 Motion for Sanctions; granting 504 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 538 Motion for Sanctions; denying 539 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 540 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting Plaintiff's 541 Motion for Leave to File to file late response; directing the Clerk to tax costs as requested in the pending bill of costs (Docs. 498 , 499 , 500 , and 502 .) The Officer Defendants shall file a revised request for fees in accordance with the Court's findings herein within 21 days. This case stands closed. Signed by District Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/23/2026. (jlh)
|
Filing
508
CLERK'S JUDGMENT pursuant to the 313 Order entered October 2, 2019. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/4/2023. (ca)
|
Filing
492
CLERK'S JUDGMENT pursuant to the Court's findings on June 12, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/28/2023. (gmh)
|
Filing
356
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiffs' 354 Motion to Stay; granting the Parties' 355 Motion to Continue Trial. The proposed pretrial order shall be filed by 5:00 P.M. on Friday, September 2, 2022. The pretrial conference in this matter is scheduled for Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 2:00 P.M. Lead Counsel for each Party must attend. Jury selection and trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, October 24, 2022, at 9:00 A.M. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 4/20/2022. (ca) Modified on 4/20/2022 (thb).
|
Filing
316
ORDER APROVING re 315 Stipulation of Dismissal. The Court hereby DISMISSES Defendants Carolyn Carrol, Brandon Cearnel, Kim Hardee, Christopher Henderson, Candice Hill, John Jones, Jeffery Mullis, Justin Swope, Gene Tootle, and Joseph White from this case WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 12/23/19. (loh)
|
Filing
313
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants Andrew McFarlane, Nathaniel Milton, Melvin Wells, Jarrod Bennett, Gordon Pittman, and Gary Mitchell's Motion for Summary Judgment, 240 . The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion in full as t o Defendants McFarlane, Milton, Mitchell, and Wells. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Andrew McFarlane, Nathaniel Milton, Gary Mitchell, and Melvin Wells, as Defendants in this case. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion as to Defendants Bennett and Pittman. The Court DIRECTS all remaining parties to file one joint status report within twenty-one days of the date of this Order as directed herein and ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, as to why certain Defendants should not be dismissed from this action for lack of timely service. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on October 2, 2019. (pmh)
|
Filing
307
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 242 Motion Exclude Expert Testimony. Mr. Atherton may offer testimony on acceptable use of force standards and practices in correctional settings and he may respond to appropriately posed hypotheticals, but he may not opine on what he believes the handheld video evidence shows or on the ultimate issue of whether Defendants used excessive force or had intent to harm Plaintiffs. Except as explicitly set forth herein, Plaintiffs shall not be permitted to introduce or rely upon Mr. Athertons expert testimony and opinions. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/14/19. (jrb)
|
Filing
188
ORDER denying 132 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 134 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/27/2017. (thb)
|
Filing
94
ORDER directing the parties to file a report within 14 days of this order detailing the status of their case, (Status Report due by 5/29/2015). Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/15/15. (cmr)
|
Filing
81
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 20 Motion to Strike; granting 20 Motion to Stay; denying 35 Motion to Dismiss; denying 35 Motion to Strike; granting 35 Motion to Stay; adopting in part 41 Report and Recommendations; granting 70 Motion; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 4/15/13. (bcw) Modified on 4/15/2013 (bcw).
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 36 Motion for a Stay of the proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 2/15/2013. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.