D'Angelo v. Morales

Respondent: Jose Morales
Petitioner: Campanella D'Angelo
Case Number: 6:2013cv00062
Filed: June 13, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Statesboro Office
County: Screven
Referring Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: B. Avant Edenfield
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 27, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING re 8 Report and Recommendations dismissing this case. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 11/27/2013. (loh)
December 11, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying D'Angelo's construed motion for a certificate of appealability re 14 Notice of Appeal filed by Campanella D'Angelo. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 12/11/13. (bcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D'Angelo v. Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jose Morales
Represented By: Paula K. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Campanella D'Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.