Grimes v. The Board of Regents of the University System of the State of Georgia et al
| Lakeita Grimes |
| The Board of Regents of the University System of the State of Georgia, Georgia Southern University, Brooks A. Keel, Charles Patterson, John R. Diebolt and Samuel Todd |
| 6:2013cv00075 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 ra |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER that the Defendant's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the Defendant. The Clerk shall terminated all deadlines and motions and close the case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/29/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the 13 MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Georgia Southern University, John R. Diebolt, Charles Patterson, Brooks A. Keel, Samuel Todd, The Board of Regents of the University System of the State of Georgia. Cou nts I, III, IV, V, VI, are dismissed without prejudice. Within Count II, any claim that Defendants violated Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C 1981 rights by denying her admission to GSU's graduate program is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's remaining claims under 1981 may proceed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/27/14. (wwp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
