Thomas v. Hutcheson et al
| Ryan Patric Thomas |
| Joseph Hutcheson, Leroy Kubachi, Alma Brown and I. McCloud |
| 6:2014cv00016 |
| March 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER directing each party to file with the Clerk of this Court a proposed pretrial order by the close of business on Friday, January 8, 2016. This case will be scheduled by the Clerk for a pretrial conference. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/8/2016. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/02/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER overruling 65 and 67 Objections; adopting 66 Report and Recommendations; and granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Brown and McLeod are granted summary judgment in their favor, and Defendants Brown and McLeod are dismissed from this case. Defendants Kubacki and Hutcheson are denied summary judgment, and all of Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants shall remain pending. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/26/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
66
In order to clarify any confusion caused by this error, the undersigned hereby WITHDRAWS the Order and Report and Recommendation issued on 6/29/15 (doc. 64). REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' 52 MOTION for Su mmary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Brown and McLeod should be GRANTED, and all claims against those Defendants should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' Motio n for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Kubacki and Hutcheson should be DENIED, and all claims against those Defendants should remain pending. Likewise, as to Defendants Kubacki and Hutcheson, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment based on qua lified immunity, de miminis physical injury under the PLRA, and claims for injunctive relief should be DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to claims based on vicarious or supervisory liability and claims for money damages against Defendants in their official capacities should be DENIED AS MOOT. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. ORDER directing service of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/15/2015. (ca)
|
|
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Brown and McLeod should be GRANTED and all cla ims against those Defendants should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Kubacki and Hutcheson should be DENIED, and all claims against those Defendants should remain pending. Likewise, as to Defe ndants Kubacki and Huthcheson, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment based on qualified immunity, de mininis physical injury under the PLRA, and claims for injunctive relief should be DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to claims based on vicarious or supervisory liability and claims for money damages against Defendants in their official capacities should be DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint should be DISMISSED, and this case should be CLOSED. Additionally , Plaintiff should be DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/26/2015. Modified on 6/29/2015 (ca).
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING re 13 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's monetary claims against Defendants in their official capacities and his Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 8/18/2014. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
