Ameris Bank v. SB Partners, LLC et al
| Ameris Bank |
| SB Partners, LLC and Roy S. Shiver, Jr. |
| 6:2014cv00097 |
| September 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Ameris Bank and against Shiver and this case is closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/4/16. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER directing the Clerk to serve Mr. Shiver with a copy of this Order, the Motion for Summary Judgment 22 , and the Griffith Notice 25 at his current address. Mr. Shiver has until 7/6/15 to file any response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/11/15. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER directing Mr. Shiver to file a response by 5:00 pm on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 re 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment. ( Compliance due by 5/27/2015.). Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 05/15/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk Orders the Clerk to enter a judgment against SB Partners in favor of Ameris. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 12/9/14. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
4
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/3/2014. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
