Lawrence v. Unnamed Defendant

Lawrence v. Unnamed Defendant

Plaintiff:	Marlin Lawrence
Defendant:	Unnamed Defendant
Case Number:	6:2015cv00092
Filed:	August 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Statesboro Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 30, 2015	Filing 7 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 6 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint; denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; and authorizing and directing the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/30/2015. (jah)
October 6, 2015	Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that this action be DISMISSED, without prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Complaint. I further recommend that the C ourt deny Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered ( Objections to R&R due by 10/23/2015). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/6/2015. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 30, 2015

Filing 7 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 6 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint; denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; and authorizing and directing the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/30/2015. (jah)

October 6, 2015

Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that this action be DISMISSED, without prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Complaint. I further recommend that the C ourt deny Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered ( Objections to R&R due by 10/23/2015). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/6/2015. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawrence v. Unnamed Defendant
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlin Lawrence
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?