Bell v. Bryson et al
Levon Victor Bell |
Homer Bryson, Stanley Williams, Bobbit, Ellis, Hunt and Corey Osborne |
6:2015cv00114 |
September 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Statesboro Office |
Bulloch |
R. Stan Baker |
J. Randal Hall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations; dismissing Plaintiff's action, and denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Clerk of Court is hereby authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/24/2016. (thb) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that this action be DISMISSED, without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to follow Court Orders re 1 Complaint filed by Levon Victor Bell. I further recommend that the Court deny Plai ntiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is OREDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPROT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 2/3/2016. (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.