Martin v. Smith et al
| Kendrick R. Martin |
| Tarmarshe Smith and Madia C. West |
| 6:2015cv00142 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| R. Stan Baker |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER adopting the 5 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; and authorizing and directing the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/15/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action, without prejudice, and DIRECT the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Complaint filed by Kendrick R. Martin. I furt her recommend that the Court DENY Martin leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/12/2016. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
