Jackson v. Williams et al
| Clinton V. Jackson |
| Doug Williams, Officer Novi and Officer Kelly |
| 6:2016cv00112 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| R. Stan Baker |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff's action without prejudice, and denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/16/2016. (thb)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to follow this Court's Orders and failure to prosecute. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/21/2016. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
