Quintanilla v. Bryson et al
| Edgar Quintanilla |
| Homer Bryson, Robert Toole, Otis Stanton, Doug Williams, Eric Smokes, Deric Godfrey and Watkins |
| 6:2017cv00004 |
| January 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| R. Stan Baker |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 96 Motion to Dismiss and dismisses without prejudice Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to close the case. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/20/20. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER finding as moot 25 Motion for Documents at Court Expense. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/8/17. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER overruling objections and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint, dismisses as moot all pending motions, and denies Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate judgment to dismissal and to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/31/2017. (thb) Modified on 8/31/2017 (thb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
