Crockett v. Kile
Plaintiff: William Crockett
Defendant: Mike Kile
Case Number: 6:2017cv00028
Filed: February 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Statesboro Office
County: Screven
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close this case. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/24/2017. (thb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett v. Kile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Crockett
Represented By: Lisa Golan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Kile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?