YOUNG v. ADAMS et al
PRESTON MARZETTE YOUNG |
Robert Adams, Jr., Bell and CRIBS |
6:2017cv00062 |
April 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Statesboro Office |
XX US, Outside State |
R. Stan Baker |
J. Randal Hall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendations; overruling objections; dismissing as moot 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint for failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history and directs the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/25/2017. (thb) |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case. I also RECOMMEND that the Court DENY Plainti ff in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 5/24/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/10/2017. (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.