Mitchell v. Berry

Mitchell v. Berry

Petitioner:	William George Mitchell
Respondent:	Walter Berry
Case Number:	6:2017cv00119
Filed:	September 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Statesboro Office
County:	Emanuel
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 10, 2018	Filing 25 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Walter Berry against William George Mitchell. Petitioner Mitchell is denied in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. This case stands closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/10/2018. (jlh)
July 24, 2018	Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Mitchell's 1 Section 2254 Petition based on his failure to respond to a Court Order. It is also RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT Respondent's [1 5] MOTION to Dismiss, DISMISS Mitchell's Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Mitchell in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/24/2018. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 10, 2018

Filing 25 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Walter Berry against William George Mitchell. Petitioner Mitchell is denied in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. This case stands closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/10/2018. (jlh)

July 24, 2018

Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Mitchell's 1 Section 2254 Petition based on his failure to respond to a Court Order. It is also RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT Respondent's [1 5] MOTION to Dismiss, DISMISS Mitchell's Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Mitchell in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/24/2018. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Berry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William George Mitchell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Walter Berry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?