Quality Deer Processing LLC v. Sherrod

Plaintiff: Quality Deer Processing LLC
Defendant: James Arthur Sherrod, Jr
Case Number: 6:2018cv00018
Filed: February 14, 2018
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Statesboro Office
County: Emanuel
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Referring Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 30, 2018 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/30/2018. (thb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quality Deer Processing LLC v. Sherrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quality Deer Processing LLC
Represented By: Luke Anderson
Represented By: Charles J. Bowen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Arthur Sherrod, Jr
Represented By: Benjamin W. Karpf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?