Dooley v. Heins et al
Plaintiff: Quentin A. Dooley
Defendant: Heins and Broome
Case Number: 6:2018cv00049
Filed: April 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Statesboro Office
County: Bulloch
Presiding Judge: R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to follow this Court's Order and failure to prosecute, directs the Clerk of Court to close this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and denies Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 7/1/2021. (ca)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER re 28 U.S. Marshal Return of Service. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to provide any information regarding Defendants' whereabouts or any additional personally identifiable information for Defendants to the U.S. Marshals Service and this Court within 30 days of this Order. (Compliance due by 2/12/2021.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 1/13/2021. (ca)
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING the 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, dismissing Plaintiff's monetary damages claims against Defendants in their official capacities. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants in their individual capacities remain pending. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/14/2020. (jlh)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages against Defendants in their official capacities. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file s pecific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 2/4/2020). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. ORDER Direct ing Service by USMS of 8 Amended Complaint, and this Order. Generally, a defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until 60 days after the date that the marshal sent the request for waiver. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 1/21/2020. (Attachments: # 1 USM-285 Forms). (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dooley v. Heins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quentin A. Dooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?