Berry v. Kight et al
| Phillip Michael Berry |
| Jake Kraus, John Does, Jr. Alvie Lee Kight, City of Lyons, Wesley Walker, County of Toombs, Marty Craven, Sergeant Marty Craven and Alvie Lee Kight, Jr. |
| 6:2018cv00132 |
| December 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S ORDER granting re #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. (loh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: City of Lyons; County of Toombs; Marty Craven; Alvie Lee Kight, Jr.; Jake Kraus; Wesley Walker answer due 3/1/2019. (loh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven P. Bristol on behalf of County of Toombs, Marty Craven, Alvie Lee Kight, Jr (Bristol, Steven) |
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead , by City of Lyons, Jake Kraus, Wesley Walker. Responses due by 2/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Proposed Order Extending Time for Defendants to Answer)(Appel, Adam) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. (loh) |
Filing 4
RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/4/19. (loh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (trb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
