Ivey et al v. United States Department of Defense, Department of the Army
Patrick A. Ivey and Starla Ivey |
United States Department of Defense, Department of the Army doing business as The Georgia Army National Guard |
6:2021cv00070 |
September 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/14/2021. (ca) |
Filing 5 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Patrick A. Ivey, Starla Ivey. (Snipes, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Department of Defense, Department of the Army, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ca) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Patrick A. Ivey, Starla Ivey. (Snipes, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Defense, Department of the Army, filed by Patrick A. Ivey, Starla Ivey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
Filing fee: $402, receipt number AGASDC-3186017. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.