Franklin et al v. Beasley et al
| Lawrence D. Franklin and Timothy Long |
| Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director, Food Service/Food Service Stewards, All Staff Members, Jane or John Doe, Georgia Dept of Corrections Employee, Kitchen Stewards of Smith State Prison, Officer Kelly, SSP, Mrs. Davis, John Doe Akamrd and Whitfield |
| 6:2023cv00037 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| J Randal Hall |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in accordance of the conditions within this Order. PLRA due by 8/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 07/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 PLRA Forms.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing Emergency Petition by Lawrence D. Franklin. (gmh) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director, Georgia Dept of Corrections Employee, Kitchen Stewards of Smith State Prison, Kelly, SSP, Davis, John Doe Akamrd, Whitfield, filed by Lawrence D. Franklin.(jlh) Modified on 7/24/2023 (jlh). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER ADOPTING #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs' #4 Motion to Transfer is denied. Since Plaintiff Long's claims have been severed, and will proceed in case number CV623-038, his is dismissed from this case. The Clerk is directed to terminate Long as a Plaintiff in this case, and all future pleadings shall conform, and Plaintiff Franklin's #9 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis remains pending before the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 7/10/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence D. Franklin. Responses due by 6/30/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(jrb) Modified on 6/16/2023 (gmh). |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Long should be dismissed from this case, and Plaintiffs' joint #4 MOTION to Transfer should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/7/2023. (ca) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' joint #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk is directed to server plaintiff Timothy Long from this case and to open a new civil case, identifying Long as the plaintiff and naming the same defendants as the instant action, docket a copy of the joint Complaint in the new case, docket the previously issued #6 Notice of Filing Fee Deficiency, and this Order and Report and Recommendation into the new case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/7/2023. (ca)
|
| Set Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/5/2023. (ca) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Filing Fee Deficiency as to Timothy Long re #1 Complaint. Set Deadlines: Compliance due by 6/23/2023. (ca) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Set Deadlines: Compliance due by 6/23/2023. (ca) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer by Lawrence D. Franklin, Timothy Long. Responses due by 6/16/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Lawrence D. Franklin, Timothy Long. Responses due by 6/16/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
| Filing 2 Inmate Account Statement by Lawrence D. Franklin. (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Timothy Long, Lawrence D. Franklin.(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
